Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Lymphedema after breast cancer: comparison between two physical therapy techniques - a pilot study

Full text
Author(s):
Nara Fernanda Braz da Silva Leal [1] ; Letícia Alves Rios Dias [2] ; Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara [3] ; Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira [4]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia - Brasil
[2] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Brasil
[3] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia - Brasil
[4] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Biomecânica, Medicina e Reabilitação do Aparelho Locomotor - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: Fisioter. mov.; v. 24, n. 4, p. 647-654, 2011-12-00.
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is an illness with physical and psychological important effects. Its treatment forms include axillary dissection sugery. A considerable postoperative consequence is the upper limb lymphedema. The principal therapy of lymphedema is descongestive lymphatic therapy. Electrical stimulation has been applied clinically in reduction of edema. Due to this, it is a new alternative for lymphedema treatment to be studied. OBJECTIVE: To compare the descongestive lymphatic therapy with a protocol that includes electrical stimulation, upper limb exercises and compression by bandages in the reduction of axillary dissection secondary lymphedema. METHOD: twelve volunteers were distributed randomly in the two groups and they were submitted to different treatments (FCD and EAV). The reduction of lymphedema was valued by perimetry and volumetry of upper limb. The interventions were realized twice a week during a period of seven weeks. RESULTS: It did not reach statistic significance in reduction of edema. CONCLUSION: With a small sample of patients, there was no difference between the techniques in reducing lymphedema when applied to the maintenance phase. The time of installation of lymphedema, axillary dissection, sugery and radiotherapy contribute for degree of lymphedema and its treatment. The use of bandages compressive by the patients influences the success of therapy. (AU)