| Author(s): |
McNulty, Kelly Lee
[1]
;
Elliott-Sale, Kirsty Jayne
[2]
;
Dolan, Eimear
[3]
;
Swinton, Paul Alan
[4]
;
Ansdell, Paul
[1]
;
Goodall, Stuart
[1]
;
Thomas, Kevin
[1]
;
Hicks, Kirsty Marie
[1]
Total Authors: 8
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Northumbria Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Sport Exercise & Rehabil, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear - England
[2] Nottingham Trent Univ, Dept Sport Sci, Hlth & Performance Enhancement SHAPE Res Ctr, Nottingham - England
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Appl Physiol & Nutr Res Grp, Escola Educ Fis & Esporte, Fac Med FMUSP, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[4] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Aberdeen - Scotland
Total Affiliations: 4
|
Background Concentrations of endogenous sex hormones fluctuate across the menstrual cycle (MC), which could have implications for exercise performance in women. At present, data are conflicting, with no consensus on whether exercise performance is affected by MC phase. Objective To determine the effects of the MC on exercise performance and provide evidence-based, practical, performance recommendations to eumenorrheic women. Methods This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Four databases were searched for published experimental studies that investigated the effects of the MC on exercise performance, which included at least one outcome measure taken in two or more defined MC phases. All data were meta-analysed using multilevel models grounded in Bayesian principles. The initial meta-analysis pooled pairwise effect sizes comparing exercise performance during the early follicular phase with all other phases (late follicular, ovulation, early luteal, mid-luteal and late luteal) amalgamated. A more comprehensive analysis was then conducted, comparing exercise performance between all phases with direct and indirect pairwise effect sizes through a network meta-analysis. Results from the network meta-analysis were summarised by calculating the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Study quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist and a strategy based on the recommendations of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. Results Of the 78 included studies, data from 51 studies were eligible for inclusion in the initial pairwise meta-analysis. The three-level hierarchical model indicated a trivial effect for both endurance- and strength-based outcomes, with reduced exercise performance observed in the early follicular phase of the MC, based on the median pooled effect size (ES0.5 = - 0.06 {[}95% credible interval (CrI): - 0.16 to 0.04]). Seventy-three studies had enough data to be included in the network meta-analysis. The largest effect was identified between the early follicular and the late follicular phases of the MC (ES0.5 = - 0.14 {[}95% CrI: - 0.26 to - 0.03]). The lowest SUCRA value, which represents the likelihood that exercise performance is poor, or among the poorest, relative to other MC phases, was obtained for the early follicular phase (30%), with values for all other phases ranging between 53 and 55%. The quality of evidence for this review was classified as ``low{''} (42%). Conclusion The results from this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that exercise performance might be trivially reduced during the early follicular phase of the MC, compared to all other phases. Due to the trivial effect size, the large between-study variation and the number of poor-quality studies included in this review, general guidelines on exercise performance across the MC cannot be formed; rather, it is recommended that a personalised approach should be taken based on each individual's response to exercise performance across the MC. (AU) |