Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Comparison of the Self-Adjusting File and Hedstrom File Used as Supplementary Instruments for the Remaining Filling Material Removal During Retreatment of C-Shaped Canals: A Micro-CT Study

Full text
Author(s):
Silva, Pablo Amoroso [1] ; Alcalde, Murilo Priori [2] ; Vivan, Rodrigo Ricci [2] ; Hungaro Duarte, Marco Antonio [2]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Londrina, Dept Restorat Dent, Londrina, Parana - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol Bauru, Dept Endodont, Bauru, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL; v. 5, n. 2, p. 112-117, 2020.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Self-adjusting file (SAF) system and Hedstrom (H) file for removing remaining filling material (RFM) from C-shaped canals. Methods: 20 C-shaped mandibular second molars with C1 configurations were instrumented, filled with tagger's hybrid technique. Samples were divided into 2 groups (n=10). Reciproc R25 and a Mtwo 35/04 file were used for retreatment in both groups. Then, a 2.0 SAF file (group I) and a \#35 H file (group II) were used as supplementary steps for RFM removal. Micro-CT scanning was performed after every procedure. Total volumes were calculated and converted into percentages. Also, the minimum wall thickness at 3, 5, 7 mm from apex was calculated.The Prism 7.0 software was used as the analytical tool with a significance of 5%. Results: Initial obturation removal was approximately 64% in group I and 67% in Group II. The apical third had the highest values of RFM. The use of a H file significantly reduced the RFM compared to SAF in the total canal length respectively (30% vs 18%) and at 1-3 mm and 3-6 mm when compared to the use of SAF. A statistically significant decrease of RFM and minimum wall thickness were observed in both groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: None of the retreatment techniques completely removed RFM. The apical region was the more unaffected area. Also, the SAF file was less effective than the H file in removing the RFM. Although C-shaped canals possesses thinner dentinal wall thickness, no excessive dentine removal was observed after each instrument use. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 14/03009-1 - Evaluation of the internal anatomy, instrumentation and retreatment techniques, using new mechanized instrumentation systems on permanent mandibulary second molars with fused roots
Grantee:Pablo Andrés Amoroso Silva
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate