Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Varieties of political rhetorical reasoning: norm types, scorekeepers, and political projects

Full text
Author(s):
Sundaram, Sasikumar S. [1, 2]
Total Authors: 1
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Polit Sci, 315, Ave Prof Luciano Gualberto, Cidade Univ, BR-05508900 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Amer Univ, Sch Int Serv, Washington, DC 20016 - USA
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: INTERNATIONAL THEORY; v. 12, n. 3, p. 358-386, NOV 2020.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

How does rhetoric work in the pursuit of political projects in international relations? This article analyzes how rhetoric-wielding political actors engage in reasoning to bolster their position by drawing upon norms that underwrite interactions, and audiences as scorekeepers evaluate the reasoning by making a series of inferences. I call this mechanism rhetorical reasoning. Building on the existing classification of norms in constructivist international relations (IR) and utilizing three distinct norm types - instrumental, institutional, and moral - I show the different processes through which political actors deploy rhetoric to legitimize and justify political projects and the distinct logics through which scorekeepers make inferences and evaluate the project. This article contributes to IR theories of argumentation by providing a sharp conceptualization of political rhetoric and actor-audience relationships in the game. I illustrate the mechanism of rhetorical reasoning using Brazil's UN peace enforcement operation in Haiti in 2004 to give empirical evidence for the role of institutional norm type in patterns of rhetorical reasoning and contestations in international politics. Paying attention to political rhetoric in the actor-scorekeepers' relationships in this way clarifies important issues regarding the varieties of political projects and the different role of normativity in the game. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 17/10021-6 - Reputation, rising powers, and global governance: a pragmatic analysis of commitments of Brazil and India on humanitarian crises abroad
Grantee:Sasikumar Shanmuga Sundaram
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral