Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Haemodynamic effects of proportional assist ventilation during high-intensity exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Full text
Author(s):
Carrascossa, Claudia R. [1] ; Oliveira, Cristino C. [1] ; Borghi-Silva, Audrey [1, 2] ; Ferreira, Eloara M. V. [1] ; Maya, Joyce [1] ; Queiroga, Jr., Fernando [1] ; Berton, Danilo C. [1] ; Nery, Luiz E. [1] ; Alberto Neder, J. [1]
Total Authors: 9
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Pulm Funct & Clin Exercise Physiol Unit, Div Resp Dis, Dept Med, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Cardiopulm Physiotherapy Lab, BR-13560 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: Respirology; v. 15, n. 8, p. 1185-1191, NOV 2010.
Web of Science Citations: 14
Abstract

Background and objective: Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been proposed as a more physiological modality of non-invasive ventilation, thereby reducing the potential for deleterious cardio-circulatory effects during exercise, in patients with COPD. We therefore evaluated whether PAV modulates the kinetic and `steady-state' haemodynamic responses to exercise in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Methods: Twenty patients underwent constant-load (75-80% peak work rate) cycle ergometer exercise testing to the limit of tolerance (T(lim)), while receiving PAV or breathing spontaneously. Stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) were monitored by impedance cardiography. Results: Compared with unassisted breathing, PAV increased T(lim) in 8/20 patients (median improvement 113% (range 8 to 212) vs -20% (range -40 to -9)). PAV had no significant effects on `steady-state' haemodynamic responses either in patients with or those without increased T(lim) (P > 0.05). However, at the onset of exercise, SV kinetics were slowed with PAV, in 13/15 patients with analysable data. HR dynamics remained unaltered or failed to accelerate sufficiently in nine of these patients, thereby slowing CO kinetics (T(1/2) 61 s (range 81-30) vs 89 s (range 100-47)). These deleterious effects were not, however, associated with PAV-induced changes in T(lim) (P > 0.05). Conclusions: PAV slowed the SV and CO kinetics at the onset of high-intensity exercise in selected patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. However, these adverse effects of PAV disappeared during the stable phase of exercise, and were not related to the ergogenic potential of PAV in this patient population. (AU)