Effects of surface treatment, hydration and application method on the bond strength of a silorane adhesive and resin system to dentine

Author(s)

Pucci, Cesar R. ^[1] ; de Oliveira, Rodrigo S. ^[1] ; Caneppele, Taciana M. F. ^[1] ; Torres, Carlos R. G. ^[1] ; Borges, Alessandra B. ^[1] ; Tay, Franklin R. ^[2]

Affiliation

^[1] UNESP, Dept Restorat Dent, San Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP - Brazil

^[2] Georgia Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Endodont, Sch Dent, Augusta, GA 30912 - USA

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Journal of Dentistry; v. 41, n. 3, p. 278-286, MAR 2013.
• Web of Science Citations: 11

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of surface treatment, surface hydration (SH) and application method (AM) on the tensile bond strength of the Silorane Adhesive System (SAS) to dentine. Methods: Ninety bovine teeth were used. For the control group (n = 10), each dentine surface was treated according to the manufacturer's instructions of the SAS. The remaining teeth were randomly distributed into two groups (n = 40), according to the type of dentine surface treatment (ST)-37% phosphoric acid or Er:YAG Laser prior to the application of the SAS. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups (n = 20), according to the SH status: dry (D) or wet (W). Each subgroup was further divided into 2 subgroups (n = 10), according to the application method {[}AM: Active (AC) mode or Passive (PA) mode]. A coat of resin composite (Filtek P90) was applied on the surface. Artificial ageing was performed with a thermo-mechanical cycling machine. The specimens were sectioned into 1 mm x 1 mm x 10 mm sticks and stressed to failure using a universal testing machine. The remaining teeth in each group were used for Scanning Electron Microscopy to examine the fractured area. Data were subjected to a three-way ANOVA, Tukey's test and Dunnet's test (alpha = 0.05). Results: The ANOVA showed significant differences for SH and AM, but not for ST. For SH, the results of Tukey's test were (in MPa): D -14.9(+/- 3.8)(a), W -17.1(+/- 4.3)(b); and for AM: PA -14. 9(+/- 4.2)(a), AC -17.1(+/- 3.9)(b). Conclusions: Acid etching, when combined with a moist dentine surface and the use of primer agitation, improves the bond strength of the SAS to dentine. Clinical Significance: According to the results of the present in vitro study, modification of the application protocols for the silorane-based adhesive system may improve its clinical performance. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. (AU)