Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Prevalence of common mental disorders in a population covered by the Family Health Program (QUALIS) in São Paulo, Brazil

Full text
Author(s):
Luciana Maragno [1] ; Moisés Goldbaum [2] ; Reinaldo José Gianini [3] ; Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes [4] ; Chester Luiz Galvão César [5]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina - Brasil
[2] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina - Brasil
[3] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina - Brasil
[4] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina - Brasil
[5] Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 5
Document type: Journal article
Source: Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 22, n. 8, p. 1639-1648, 2006-08-00.
Abstract

The prevalence of common mental disorders has increased in many countries. Cases are often not identified and adequately treated because traditional health care services are rarely prepared to deal with this problem. The Family Health Program (FHP) has been implemented in Brazil since 1995-1996 and provides a new primary health care model with the potential for better care for these patients. This study investigates common mental disorders prevalence according to FHP coverage and associated socio-demographic factors. A large health and health care survey was conducted from January to March 2001 in areas partly covered by the FHP in a peripheral area of the city of Sao Paulo and included common mental disorders screening in 2,337 individuals > 15 years of age. There was no significant difference in common mental disorders prevalence according to FHP. Common mental disorders prevalence was significantly higher among females (PR = 1.34), elderly (PR = 1.56), and individuals with lower income (PR = 2.64) or less schooling (PR = 2.83). Common mental disorders was associated with indicators of social disadvantage, implying the need to focus on specific health problems and risk groups to improve the impact of care. (AU)