Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Temporomandibular disorders among Brazilian adolescents: reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire

Full text
Author(s):
Franco-Micheloni, Ana Lucia [1, 2] ; Fernandes, Giovana [1] ; de Godoi Goncalves, Daniela Aparecida [1] ; Camparis, Cinara Maria [1]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP - Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Araraquara UNIARA, Araraquara, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 22, n. 4, p. 314-322, JUL-AUG 2014.
Web of Science Citations: 10
Abstract

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) screeners assume significant item overlap with the screening questionnaire proposed by the American Academy of Orofacial Pain (AAOP). Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of AAOP questions for TMD screening among adolescents. Material and Methods: Diagnoses from Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I were used as reference standard. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency (KR-20) and inter-item correlation. Validity was tested by sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the relationship between the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (specificity). Test-retest reliability of AAOP questions and intra-examiner reproducibility of RDC/TMD Axis I were tested with kappa statistics. Results: The sample consisted of 1307 Brazilian adolescents (56.8% girls; n=742), with mean age of 12.72 years (12.69 F/12.75 M). According to RDC/TMD, 397 [30.4% (32.7% F/27.3% M)] of adolescents presented TMD, of which 330 [25.2% (27.6% F/22.2% M)] were painful TMD. Because of low consistency, items #8 and #10 of the AAOP questionnaire were excluded. Remaining items (of the long questionnaire version) showed good consistency and validity for three positive responses or more. After logistic regression, items #4, #6, #7 and #9 also showed satisfactory consistency and validity for two or more positive responses (short questionnaire version). Both versions demonstrated excellent specificity (about 90%), but higher sensitivity for detecting painful TMD (78.2%). Better reproducibility was obtained for the short version (k=0.840). Conclusions: The Portuguese version of AAOP questions showed both good reliability and validity for the screening of TMD among adolescents, especially painful TMD, according to RDC/TMD. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 10/20445-9 - VALIDATION OF A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION IN A POPULATIONAL SAMPLE OF ADOLESCENTS
Grantee:Ana Lúcia Franco Micheloni
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate