Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Comparison of the effects of TripleGates and Gates-Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal area by using cone beam computed tomography

Full text
Author(s):
Sousa, Kassio ; Andrade-Junior, Carlos Vieira [1, 2] ; da Silva, Juliana Melo [3] ; Hungaro Duarte, Marco Antonio [4] ; De-Deus, Gustavo [5] ; Nogueira Leal da Silva, Emmanuel Joao [5]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estacio Sa, Rio De Janeiro, RJ - Brazil
[2] Southwest Bahia State Univ UESB, Jequie, BA - Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Para, BR-66059 Belem, Para - Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent Endodont & Dent Mat, Bauru, SP - Brazil
[5] Grande Rio Univ Unigranrio, Hlth Sci Ctr, Rio De Janeiro, RJ - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 5
Document type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 23, n. 2, p. 164-168, MAR-APR 2015.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

The search for new instruments to promote an appropriate cervical preparation has led to the development of new rotary instruments such as TripleGates. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no study evaluating TripleGates effect on the “risk zone” of mandibular molars. Objectives : The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a crown-down sequence of Gates-Glidden and TripleGates burs on the remaining cervical dentin thickness and the total amount of dentin removed from the root canals during the instrumentation by using cone beam computed tomography. The number of separated instruments was also evaluated. Material and Methods : Mesial roots of 40 mandibular first molars were divided into 2 equal groups: crown-down sequence of Gates-Glidden (#3, #2, #1) and TripleGates burs. Cervical dentin thickness and canal area were measured before and after instrumentation by using cone beam computed tomography and image analysis software. Student’s t-test was used to determine significant differences at p<0.05. Results : No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed between the instruments, regarding the root canal area and dentin wall thickness. Conclusion : Both tested instruments used for cervical preparation were safe to be used in the mesial root canal of mandibular molars. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 12/06738-9 - Evaluation of materials, instruments and protocols of irrigation used in Endodontic treatment, by means of scanning electron microscopy and micro analysis of x-ray.
Grantee:Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants