Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin

Full text
Author(s):
Pintado-Palomino, Karen [1] ; Vasconcelos Barros de Almeida, Cecilia Vilela [1] ; Goncalves da Motta, Raphael Jurca [1] ; Parise Fortes, Joao Henrique [1] ; Tirapelli, Camila [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Ave Cafe Sn, BR-14040904 Bairro Monte Alegre, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 1
Document type: Journal article
Source: CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS; v. 23, n. 4, p. 1855-1864, APR 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations regarding experimental and regular adhesive protocols in caries affected-dentin (CAD).Material and methodsA total of 92 class I and class II cavities with carious lesions were selected and randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) bioactive glass-ceramic powder/two-step etch and rinse system, (2) control/two-step etch and rinse system, (3) bioactive glass-ceramic powder/two-step self-etching system, and (4) control/two-step self-etching system. Two operators carried out the adhesive protocols and restored the cavities with a nano-hybrid resin composite. Participants were followed up at 1week and 6, 12, and 18months for clinical evaluation performed by two blinded examiners and calibrated according to FDI criteria. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests with a confidence of 95%.ResultsThe clinical performance of resin composite restoration was not affected by the experimental use of an adhesive protocol including a bioactive glass-ceramic powder for 18months post-procedure. However, there was a significant difference between group 2 and group 4 (p<0.05) for marginal adaptation (18months). Group 2 was significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05) for fracture of material/retention (18months) and marginal adaptation (1week); group 2 showed a better performance.ConclusionAdhesive protocols can alter the clinical performance of posterior restorations in terms of marginal adaptation and the fracture of material/retention in CAD. Clinical significance: Adhesive protocols may influence the success of resin composite restorations in CAD; this is important because failure can lead to caries, re-incidence, and/or clinical re-work. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/07793-6 - CEPIV - Center for Teaching, Research and Innovation in Glass
Grantee:Edgar Dutra Zanotto
Support type: Research Grants - Research, Innovation and Dissemination Centers - RIDC
FAPESP's process: 10/12032-6 - Evaluating remineralizers and desensitizers agents in dental bleaching treatment: in vitro and in vivo study
Grantee:Camila Tirapelli
Support type: Regular Research Grants