| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Total Authors: 4
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Univ Aveiro, Aveiro - Portugal
[2] Beacon ABA Serv Inc, Leominster, MA - USA
[3] Univ Fed ABC UFABC, Santo Andre, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Redlands, Redlands, CA 92373 - USA
Total Affiliations: 4
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | PERSPECTIVES ON BEHAVIOR SCIENCE; v. 43, n. 4 NOV 2020. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 1 |
| Abstract | |
Eckard and Lattal (2020) summarized the behavioristic view of hypothetical constructs and theories, and then, in a novel and timely manner, applied this view to a critique of internal clock models of temporal control. In our three-part commentary, we aim to contribute to the authors' discussion by first expanding upon their view of the positive contributions afforded by constructs and theories. We then refine and question their view of the perils of reifying constructs and assigning them causal properties. Finally, we suggest to behavior analysts four rules of conduct for dealing with mediational theories: tolerate constructs proposed with sufficient reason; consider them seriously, both empirically and conceptually; develop alternative, behavior-analytic models with overlapping empirical domains; and contrast the various models. Through variation and selection, behavioral science will evolve. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 14/50909-8 - INCT 2014: Behavior, Cognition and Teaching (INCT-ECCE): relational learning and symbolic functioning |
| Grantee: | Deisy das Graças de Souza |
| Support Opportunities: | Research Projects - Thematic Grants |