A TYPOLOGY FOR MCDM METHODS BASED ON THE RATIONALITY OF THEIR PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROCEDURES

Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti; Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes

Advanced search

Search - Use quotation marks to get a more specific result

Index

Field of knowledge

Start date

Betweenand

(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

A TYPOLOGY FOR MCDM METHODS BASED ON THE RATIONALITY OF THEIR PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROCEDURES

Full text
Author(s):	Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti ^[1] ; Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes ^[2] Total Authors: 2
Affiliation:	^[1] University of São Paulo. School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting - Brasil ^[2] Ibmec University Center. Ibmec School of Business and Economics - Brasil Total Affiliations: 2
Document type:	Journal article
Source:	Pesquisa Operacional; v. 42, 2022-07-18.
Abstract
ABSTRACT MCDM methods have been proposed to select, rank, classify, or describe alternatives based on the process of pairwise comparison. While the typologies of MCDM methods present in the literature usually are focused on their amalgamation phase, this paper proposes a typology for classifying MCDM methods based on the rationality of their pairwise comparison procedures. Accordingly, four discriminants were used to provide support in choosing MCDM methods based on the typology proposed. The proposed typology allows the analyst to identify the type of rationality from MCDM methods that best fits the multicriteria problem. (AU)

FAPESP's process:	16/03722-5 - Structural development for the use of Game Theory in organizational group multicriteria decision making problem solving
Grantee:	Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti
Support Opportunities:	Regular Research Grants

Short URL