Physiological responses during walking in men and women with intermittent claudication

Author(s)

Roberto Sanches Miyasato ^[1] ; Alex Jesus Felix ^[2] ; Aluísio Andrade-Lima ; Natan Daniel da Silva Júnior ^[4] ; Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias ^[5] ; Nelson Wolosker ; Véronique Cornelissen ^[7] ; Karla Fabiana Goessler ^[8] ; Claúdia Lúcia de Moraes Forjaz ^[9]

Affiliation

^[1] Universidade de São Paulo. School of Physical Education and Sport. xercise Hemodynamic Laboratory - Brasil

^[2] Universidade de São Paulo. School of Physical Education and Sport. xercise Hemodynamic Laboratory - Brasil

^[4] Universidade de São Paulo. School of Physical Education and Sport. xercise Hemodynamic Laboratory - Brasil

^[5] Universidade Nove de Julho - Brasil

^[7] University of Leuven - Bélgica

^[8] University of Leuven - Bélgica

^[9] Universidade de São Paulo. School of Physical Education and Sport. xercise Hemodynamic Laboratory - Brasil

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Einstein (São Paulo); v. 21, 2023-12-15.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), anaerobic threshold, walking economy, and cardiovascular responses during walking are used to guide and monitor walking training in patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication. Women with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication present greater impairments than men, and evaluating training markers according to sex for decisions regarding walking prescription in this population is important. This study aimed to compare VO2peak, walking economy, anaerobic threshold, and cardiovascular responses during walking in men and women with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication. Methods Forty patients (20 men and 20 women with similar baseline characteristics) underwent a cardiopulmonary treadmill test (3.2km/h and 2% increase in slope every 2 minutes until maximal leg pain). The VO2 and rate-pressure product were assessed. Data from men and women were compared using t-tests. Results There were no significant differences between men and women (VO2peak: 15.0±4.8 versus 13.9±2.9mL∙kg-1∙min-1, p=0.38; walking economy: 9.6±2.7 versus 8.4±1.6mL∙kg-1∙min-1, p=0.09; anaerobic threshold: 10.5±3.2 versus 10.5±2.2mL∙kg-1∙min-1, p=0.98; rate pressure product at 1st stage: 13,465± 2,910 versus 14,445±4,379bpm∙mmHg, p=0.41; and rate pressure product at anaerobic threshold:13,673±3,100 versus 16,390±5,870bpm∙mmHg, p=0.08 and rate pressure product at peak exercise: 21,253±6,141 versus 21,923±7,414bpm∙mmHg, p=0.76, respectively). Conclusion Men and women with peripheral artery disease and similar baseline characteristics presented similar responses to walking, suggesting that decisions regarding walking prescription and monitoring can be made regardless of sex in this specific population. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 17/12973-4 - Cardiovascular and autonomic responses to maximal exercise in men and women with intermittent claudication
• Grantee: Roberto Sanches Miyasato
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master