Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Shaping ability of a pediatric motor-driven instrumentation system in primary molar root canal prototypes

Full text
Author(s):
Bianca Katsumata de Souza [1] ; Murilo Priori Alcalde [2] ; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte [3] ; Maria Aparecida Andrade Moreira Machado [4] ; Thais Marchini Oliveira [5] ; Natalino Lourenço Neto [6]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] University of São Paulo - Brasil
[2] University of São Paulo - Brasil
[3] University of São Paulo - Brasil
[4] University of São Paulo - Brasil
[5] University of São Paulo - Brasil
[6] University of São Paulo - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 6
Document type: Journal article
Source: Brazilian Dental Journal; v. 34, n. 5, p. 36-42, 2023-12-22.
Abstract

Abstract Evaluate the shaping ability and preparation time using a pediatric motor-driven rotary instrumentation compared to other systems in resin prototypes of primary molars. Methods: Thirty specimens were scanned in micro-CT and divided into three groups according to the instrumentation type: pediatric motor-driven Sequence baby File (SBF); conventional motor-driven (Sequence Rotary File - SRF); manual K file. Instrumentation time was timed. After preparation, the specimens were scanned again. The pre- and post-instrumentation images were superimposed to measure the amount of root canal deviation and the resin remnant thickness. ANOVA followed by the Tukey test analyzed the comparisons between groups (p<0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences occurred in root canal deviation among groups (p>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the comparison among root thirds (p<0.001) but without significant differences in the interaction group vs. root third (p>0.05). Both motor-driven instrumentations showed statistically greater weariness than manual instrumentation (p<0.001), without significant significant differences between SBF and SRF. Motor-driven instrumentation had a shorter working time than manual instrumentation (p<0.001). Conclusion: Pediatric motor-driven instrumentation demonstrated good outcomes in relation to root canal deviation and amount of remnant structure, with shorter instrumentation time. SBF can be a suitable alternative for endodontic instrumentation in primary molars. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 21/06342-7 - Comparison between manual, rotary instrumentation, pediatric rotary instrumentation and reciprocating on the quality of preparation, timing and safety in prototyped primary molars
Grantee:Natalino Lourenço Neto
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants