Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

An in situ/ex vivo comparison of the ability of regular and light colas to induce enamel wear when erosion is combined with abrasion

Full text
Author(s):
Rios, Daniela [1] ; Zaidan Santos, Flavia Cardoso ; Honorio, Heitor Marques [2] ; Magalhaes, Ana Carolina [3] ; Wang, Linda [4] ; de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Apareolda [1] ; Rabelo Buzalaf, Marilia Afonso [3]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Alfenas Fed Univ, Dept Pediat Dent, Alfenas - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Biol Sci, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: Quintessence International; v. 42, n. 3 MAR 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 7
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the type of cola drink (regular or diet) could influence the wear of enamel subjected to erosion followed by brushing abrasion, Method and !Materials: Ten volunteers wore intraoral devices that each had eight bovine enamel blocks divided into four groups; ER, erosion with regular cola; EAR, erosion with regular cola plus abrasion; EL, erosion with light cola; and EAL, erosion with light cola plus abrasion, Each day for 1 week, half of each device was immersed in regular cola for 5 minutes, Then, two blocks were brushed using a fluoridated toothpaste and electric toothbrush for 30 seconds four times daily, Immediately after, the other half of the device was subjected to the same procedure using a light cola, The pH, calcium, phosphorus, and fluoride concentrations of the colas were analyzed using standard procedures, Enamel alterations were measured by profilometry. Data were tested using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test (P < .05), Results: Regarding chemical characteristics, light cola presented pH 3.0, 13.7 mg Ca/L, 15.5 mg P/L, and 0.31 mg F/L, while regular cola had pH 2.6, 32.1 mg Ca/L, 1:8.1 mg P/L, and 0.26 mg F/L, The light cola promoted less enamel loss (EL, 0.36 pm; EAL, 0.39 pm) than its regular counterpart (ER, 0.72 pm; EAR, 0.95 pm) for both conditions, There was not a significant difference (P > .05) between erosion and erosion plus abrasion for light cola, However, for regular cola, erosion plus abrasion resulted in higher enamel loss than erosion alone,.nclusion: The data suggest that light cola promoted less enamel wear even when erosion was followed by brushing abrasion, (Quintessence Int 2011;42:xxx-xx)() (AU)

FAPESP's process: 07/07296-1 - Abrasion effect on bovine enamel previously eroded with a light cola drink - in situ study
Grantee:Flávia Zaidan Cardoso dos Santos
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Scientific Initiation