Strength gain through eccentric isotonic training without changes in clinical signs or blood markers

Author(s):Show less -

Alves, Thamara ^[1] ; Guarnier, Flavia A. ^[1] ; Campoy, Fernanda A. S. ^[2] ; Gois, Mariana O. ^[3] ; Albuquerque, Maira C. ^[2] ; Seraphim, Patricia M. ^[2] ; Netto Junior, Jayme ^[2] ; Marques Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos ^[2] ; Padovani, Carlos R. ^[4] ; Cecchini, Rubens ^[1] ; Pastre, Carlos Marcelo ^[2]

Affiliation

^[1] Univ Estadual Londrina, Dept Gen Pathol, Londrina - Brazil

^[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Phys Therapy, Presidente Prudente - Brazil

^[3] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Phys Therapy, BR-13560 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil

^[4] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Biostat, Botucatu, SP - Brazil

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; v. 14, NOV 21 2013.
• Web of Science Citations: 1

Abstract

Background: Localized exercises are widely used in rehabilitation processes. The predominant options are exercises with an emphasis on either concentric or eccentric contractions. Eccentric exercises promote greater strength gains compared to classical concentric stimuli, but can cause muscle damage. The aim of present study was to compare strength training composed of 10 sessions with progressive loads between groups with a predominance of concentric versus eccentric contraction through an analysis of isotonic strength, pressure pain threshold, creatine kinase, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and cortisol. Methods: One hundred twenty male subjects were divided into four groups: C1 and E1 - single session of maximum strength with emphasis on concentric and eccentric contraction, respectively; C10 and E10 - 10 sessions with progressive loads from 80% to maximum strength with emphasis on concentric and eccentric contraction, respectively. Results: Isotonic strength increased by 10% in E10 following the ten training sessions. C1 and E1 exhibited a lower pressure pain threshold 48 hours after the sessions in comparison to C10 and E10, respectively. Creatine kinase was increased in C1 in comparison to baseline, with significant differences (p <= 0.05) in comparison to E1 at 48 and 96 hours as well as C10 at 48, 72 and 96 hours. No significant differences were found in TNF-alpha or cortisol among the groups or evaluation times. Conclusion: Eccentric contraction training promotes functional adaptation. Moreover, both concentric and eccentric contraction training have a protective effect on the muscle in relation to a single session of maximum strength exercise. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 10/09687-0 - Effects of resistance concentric versus eccentric trainning on cardiovascular, biochemical, clinical and functional parameters
• Grantee: Carlos Marcelo Pastre
• Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants