Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems?

Full text
Author(s):
Marinho, A. C. S. [1] ; Martinho, F. C. [1] ; Goncalves, L. M. [2] ; Rabang, H. R. C. [1] ; Gomes, B. P. F. A. [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Endodont Div, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, SP - Brazil
[2] Ceuma Univ UniCEUMA, Postgrad Program Dent, Sao Luis, MA - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: International Endodontic Journal; v. 48, n. 6, p. 542-548, JUN 2015.
Web of Science Citations: 14
Abstract

AimTo evaluate the effectiveness of Reciproc for the removal of cultivable bacteria and endotoxins from root canals in comparison with multifile rotary systems. MethodologyThe root canals of forty human single-rooted mandibular pre-molars were contaminated with an Escherichia coli suspension for 21days and randomly assigned to four groups according to the instrumentation system: GI - Reciproc (VDW); GII - Mtwo (VDW); GIII - ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer); and GIV -FKG Race (FKG Dentaire) (n=10 per group). Bacterial and endotoxin samples were taken with a sterile/apyrogenic paper point before (s1) and after instrumentation (s2). Culture techniques determined the colony-forming units (CFU) and the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay was used for endotoxin quantification. Results were submitted to paired t-test and anova. ResultsAt s1, bacteria and endotoxins were recovered in 100% of the root canals investigated (40/40). After instrumentation, all systems were associated with a highly significant reduction of the bacterial load and endotoxin levels, respectively: GI - Reciproc (99.34% and 91.69%); GII - Mtwo (99.86% and 83.11%); GIII - ProTaper (99.93% and 78.56%) and GIV - FKG Race (99.99% and 82.52%) (P<0.001). No statistical difference were found amongst the instrumentation systems regarding bacteria and endotoxin removal (P>0.01). ConclusionThe reciprocating single file, Reciproc, was as effective as the multifile rotary systems for the removal of bacteria and endotoxins from root canals. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/02402-9 - Microbiological and LPS investigation and their antigenic activity in teeth with pulpal necrosis and irreversible pulpitis in pro-inflammatory cytokine production
Grantee:Ariane Cássia Salustiano Marinho
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate
FAPESP's process: 10/13498-9 - Microbiological analysis and quantification of endotoxins and proinflammatory cytokines from primarily infected root canals with apical periodontitis
Grantee:Daniel Rodrigo Herrera Morante
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate
FAPESP's process: 10/17877-4 - Microbiological analysis and quantification of endotoxins and proinflammatory cytokines from primarily infected root canals with apical periodontitis
Grantee:Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants
FAPESP's process: 13/17928-6 - Analysis of Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide when presente in a bacterial comunity
Grantee:Ariane Cássia Salustiano Marinho
Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Doctorate
FAPESP's process: 10/19136-1 - Microbiological and endotoxins analysis in primarily infected root canals with apical periodontitis and their antigenic potencial against macrophages to produce IL1-beta e TNF-alfa during endodontic treatment
Grantee:Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants
FAPESP's process: 11/09047-4 - Investigation of microbial diversity from primary endodontic infection by clonal analysis and 16S rRNA sequencing
Grantee:Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants