Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Resting energy expenditure in obese women: comparison between measured and estimated values

Full text
Author(s):
Schoenardie Poli, Vanessa Fadanelli ; Sanches, Ricardo Badan ; Moraes, Amanda dos Santos ; Novo Fidalgo, Joao Pedro ; Nascimento, Maythe Amaral ; Andrade-Silva, Stephan Garcia ; Clemente, Jose Carlos ; Yi, Liu Chiao ; Caranti, Danielle Arisa
Total Authors: 9
Document type: Journal article
Source: BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION; v. 116, n. 7, p. 1306-1313, OCT 2016.
Web of Science Citations: 6
Abstract

Assessing energy requirements is a fundamental activity in clinical dietetic practice. The aim of this study was to investigate which resting energy expenditure (REE) predictive equations are the best alternatives to indirect calorimetry before and after an interdisciplinary therapy in Brazilian obese women. In all, twelve equations based on weight, height, sex, age, fat-free mass and fat mass were tested. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry. The interdisciplinary therapy consisted of nutritional, physical exercise, psychological and physiotherapy support during the course of 1 year. The average differences between measured and predicted REE, as well as the accuracy at the +/- 10% level, were evaluated. Statistical analysis included paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. Validation was based on forty obese women (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m(2)). Our major findings demonstrated a wide variation in the accuracy of REE predictive equations before and after weight loss in non-morbid, obese women. The equations reported by Harris-Benedict and FAO/WHO/United Nations University (UNU) were the only ones that did not show significant differences compared with indirect calorimetry and presented a bias < 5%. The Harris-Benedict equation provided 40 and 47.5% accurate predictions before and after therapy, respectively. The FAO equation provided 35 and 47.5% accurate predictions. However, the Bland-Altman analysis did not show good agreement between these equations and indirect calorimetry. Therefore, the Harris-Benedict and FAO/WHO/UNU equations should be used with caution for obese women. The need to critically re-assess REE data and generate regional and more homogeneous REE databases for the target population is reinforced. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 11/51723-7 - Effects of interdisciplinary therapy on metabolic syndrome control in obese adults and its relationship with pro and anti inflammatory adipocytes
Grantee:Danielle Arisa Caranti
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants