| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Panissa, Valeria L. G.
[1, 2]
;
Fukuda, David H.
[2]
;
Caldeira, Renan S.
[3]
;
Gerosa-Neto, Jose
[3]
;
Lira, Fabio S.
[3]
;
Zagatto, Alessandro M.
[4]
;
Franchini, Emerson
[1, 5]
Total Authors: 7
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Kinesiol & Phys Therapy, Orlando, FL 32816 - USA
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Exercise & Immunometab Res Grp, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[4] Sao Paulo State Univ, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[5] Australian Inst Sport, Canberra, ACT - Australia
Total Affiliations: 5
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY; v. 9, JUL 9 2018. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 3 |
| Abstract | |
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare the contributions of the anaerobic pathway as determined by two different methods and energy expenditure during a typical high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) protocol. Methods: A descriptive research design was utilized in which thirteen physically active men performed six experimental sessions consisting of an incremental test (session 1), submaximal tests at 40, 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90% of velocity associated with maximum oxygen uptake (v(V) over dotO(2max)) with two intensities per session (sessions 2-5), and the HIIE protocol (session 6; 10 efforts of 1 min at (V) over dotO(2max) interspersed by 1 min of passive recovery). The estimation of anaerobic energy system contribution was calculated by: (a) the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption plus delta lactate method and (b) the accumulated oxygen deficit method using the difference between predicted oxygen demand from the submaximal tests of varying intensities and accumulated oxygen uptake during HIIE. Estimation of aerobic energy system contribution was calculated through the measurement of oxygen consumption during activity. Total EE during the entire HIIE protocol (efforts + recovery) and for the efforts only were calculated from each method. Results: For efforts + recovery and efforts only, anaerobic contribution was similar for both methods, and consequently total EE was also equivalent (p = 0.230 for both comparisons). During efforts + recovery, aerobic:anaerobic energy system contribution was (68 +/- 4%: 32 +/- 4%), while efforts only was (54 +/- 5%: 46 +/- 5%) with both situations demonstrating greater aerobic than anaerobic contribution (p < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: Anaerobic contribution seems to be relevant during HIIE and must to be taken into account during total EE estimation; however, the type of method employed did not change the anaerobic contribution or total EE estimates. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 17/08167-2 - Pacing in judo |
| Grantee: | Emerson Franchini |
| Support type: | Scholarships abroad - Research |
| FAPESP's process: | 17/07304-6 - Is the oxygen uptake measurement enough to estimate the energy expenditure during high-intensity intermittent exercise? |
| Grantee: | Valéria Leme Gonçalves Panissa |
| Support type: | Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Post-doctor |
| FAPESP's process: | 15/11302-3 - Effect of intensity and time of exercise on appetite in overweight men |
| Grantee: | Valéria Leme Gonçalves Panissa |
| Support type: | Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctorate |