Evaluation of the combination of poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) and polyisoprene (Cellprene®) materials: histological study in rats

Author(s)

Isabella Fernanda dos SANTOS ^[1] ; Luis Alberto Loureiro dos SANTOS ^[2] ; Cassio Rocha SCARDUELI ^[3] ; Luis Carlos SPOLIDORIO ^[4] ; Elcio MARCANTONIO-JUNIOR ^[5] ; Camila Chiérici MARCANTONIO ^[6] ; Rosemary Adriana Chiérici MARCANTONIO ^[7]

Affiliation

^[1] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - Brasil

^[2] Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Departamento de Materiais. Laboratório de Biomateriais - Brasil

^[3] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - Brasil

^[4] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - Brasil

^[5] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - Brasil

^[6] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - Brasil

^[7] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - Brasil

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Rev. odontol. UNESP; v. 48, 2020-04-22.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The bone quantity and quality in implant dentistry is a highly relevant factor when it aims the use of implants and rehabilitation in patients. However, this availability is compromised in most cases, with the need to research new biomaterials, membranes and substances for more favorable regeneration. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of bone neoformation in critical defects in rat calvaries using polymeric blend fiber scaffolds from Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) and Polyisoprene (Cellprene®). The project was approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee. Material and method In this study 36 rats (Rattus Norvegicus), variation albinus, Holtzman, adults were used. The animals had trichotomy in the region of the skull and the confection of bilateral circular bone defects with a diameter of 5 mm. The animals were divided into 3 groups: Group GC - defect without biomaterial placement, Group GCol - collagen scaffolds (Bio-Gide, from Geistlich Pharma Ag - Biomaterials), Group GPoli - polymeric blend fiber scaffolds from Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid)-Polyisoprene. Each group was evaluated in 4 experimental periods (7, 15, 30 and 60 days). After these periods the animals were sacrificed and the pieces underwent routine laboratory procedures and paraffin embedding. Semi-serial sections were obtained and stained by hematoxylin and eosin technique for histometric and histological analysis. Histometric analysis was performed to evaluate the composition of repaired bone tissue (% Bone). The data obtained were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 95%. Result It was found that the GCol group presented greater defect filling in the 30 and 60 days periods compared to the GC and GPoli groups. Conclusion Polymer blend fiber scaffolds from Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) and Polyisoprene (Cellprene®) did not have advantages when used in critical defects. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 17/16699-4 - Evaluation of the combination of poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic acid) and polyisoprene (Cellprene®) materials: histological study in rats
• Grantee: Isabella Fernanda dos Santos
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Scientific Initiation