Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Comparative Study of Methods to Evaluate Three Phase Induction Motors Loading

Full text
Author(s):
de Melo, Karen Barbosa ; Gomes dos Reis, Marcos Vinicios ; da Silva, Michelle Kitayama ; Villalva, Marcelo Gradella ; Rodrigues Souza, Rubem Cesar ; Tsuzuki, MDG ; Junqueira, F
Total Authors: 7
Document type: Journal article
Source: 2018 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS (INDUSCON); v. N/A, p. 7-pg., 2018-01-01.
Abstract

There are several methods for evaluating the loading condition of three phase induction motors (TPIMs). This evaluation allows inferring about the technical feasibility of replacing the motor in use by another one of less power, contributing to the efficient use of electric energy. The work presented in this document consisted of a comparative evaluation of the Linearization (LM) and Characteristic Curves (CCM) methods; as well as those used by the software BD Motor and MarkIV Plus. The results obtained with the application of the methods were compared with reference values, which were acquired through laboratory tests of the TPIM. In the laboratory tests, a computerized bench consisting of a TPIM and a dynamometer was used. Finally, the methods were compared to each other, leading to the conclusion that the method with the best precision is the CCM, followed by the current method used in MarkIV Plus software. However, the latter uses more accessible information than the required by the CCM. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 16/08645-9 - Interdisciplinary research activities in electric smart grids
Grantee:João Bosco Ribeiro do Val
Support Opportunities: Research Projects - Thematic Grants